SPECIFICITY OF THE INTERTEXTUALITY FACTUAL BASIS RESEARCH FORMATION OF THE UKRAINIAN INTERNET SEGMENT
Keywords:
intertextuality, intertexteme, intertextuality marker, internet genres, internet discourse, internet linguistics, databaseAbstract
The basics of creating a database for the research of intertextemes used in the texts of the Ukrainian Internet segment have been worked out in this article. For this, approaches to the following concepts in modern linguistics are analyzed: Internet linguistics, Internet discourse, intertextuality, intertextuality marker, as well as a database and software product for displaying and editing information were developed. In addition, the most common models of intertextuality markers are given: as + a verb of speech (as they say, as it is being said etc.) – without indication of authorship; as + a verb of speech ((somebody) says, (somebody) said, (somebody) is saying etc.) – with indication of authorship; as + a verb of speech + proverb and a model as + it is known. The factual basis of the research was formed by means of the content analysis system Alphateka. The intertextemes search was done by the intertextuality markers (as they say, as (somebody) said, as (somebody) is saying etc.). A complex analysis of the Ukrainian Internet segment intertextuality is planned, which requires research a number of parameters, related to the text in which the intertexteme is used; linguistic personality of the author; formal and qualitative characteristics of intertextemes (the method of typing intertexteme into text, etymology of intertexteme etc.). To investigate the Ukrainian Internet segment intertextuality, a relational database was created. In addition, a software product for displaying and editing information is developed. Its main task is to automate the intertextemes characteristics analysis for their complex research. Developed software will allow you to find correlations between different intertextemes characteristics. Modern information technologies are used for research, because it enables to process a significant volume of actual material, to trace correlations between different characteristics of the investigated language phenomenon. The prospect of further researches is a database improvement, in particular its modernization, in light of the language phenomenon characteristics detected during the study and the correlation between them.
References
Akhrenova, N. A. 2013. “Teoreticheskiye osnovy internet-lingvistiki [Theoretical foundations of Internet linguistics]”. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki philologyi. Theory and practice 10:28. http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/teoreticheskie-osnovy-internet-lingvistiki
Bart, Rolan. 1989. Izbrannyye raboty. M.: Progress.
Bart, R. 1989. “Ot proizvedeniya k tekstu. P. Bart”. Izbrannye raboty: semiotika: poetika. M.: Progress. 413–423.
Bulakh, Mayya. 2012. “Alyuziyi ta reministsentsiyi v suchasnykh ukrayinskykh mas-mediynykh tekstakh”. Aktualni problemy ukrayinskoyi linhvistyky: teoriya i praktyka 24:140–148.
Darmoriz, Oksana. 2012. “Intertekstualnist yak rysa informatsiynoyi kultury”. Naukovi zapysky. Natsionalnyi universytet “Ostrozka akademiya” 11: 82–90. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nznuoafs_2012_11_10
Dayneka, Nadiya. 2016. “Intertekstualnist internet-tekstiv yak katehoriya tekstualnoyi vidkrytosti ta dialohichnosti”. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya: Perekladoznavstvo ta mizhkulturna komunikatsiya 6:59–63. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/nvxdupmk_2016_6_12
Denysyuk, Zhanna. 2016. “Suchasni komunikatyvni praktyky u formuvanni y poshyrenni postfolkloru”. Kultura i suchasnist 2: 3–9.
Dzoban, O. P. 2011. “Zasoby masovoyi komunikatsiyi v kulturi suspilstva postmodernu”. Informatsiya i pravo. 3: 93–101.
Fateyevа, Nataliya. 2000. Kontrapunkt intertekstualnosti, ili Intertekst v mire tekstov. M.: Agar.
Goroshko, E. I. 2007. Teoreticheskiy analiz Internet-zhanrov: k opisaniyu problemnoy oblasti. Zhanry rechi. Saratov.
Hayna, H. A. 2005. Osnovy proektuvannya baz danykh. K: KNUBA.
Hurduz, A. 2007. “Intertekstualnist i hipertekst: problemy teoriyi i praktyky”. Ukrayinskka mova y literatura v serednikh shkolakh, himnaziyakh, litseyakh ta kolehiumakh 4:67–72.
Ilchenko, O. A. 2011. “Movnostylistychni modyfikatsiyi presy ХХІ st.: pryroda y naslidky”. Linhvistychni doslidzhennya 31:157–161.
Kompantseva, L. F. 2008. “Internet-lingvistika kognitivno-pragmaticheskiy i lingvokultorologicheskiy podkhod”.
[Internet-linguistics: cognitive-pragmatic and linguocultural approaches]. Lugansk: Znanie Publ.
Kristeva Yulia. 2000. “Bakhtin, slovo, dialog i roman”. Frantsuzskaya semiotika: ot strukturalizma k poststrukturalizmu. M.: Progress. 427–457.
Kristeva Yulia. 1974. La Revolution du langage poetique. Paris: Eitions du Seuil.
Levchenko, Olena. 2013. Intertekstualnist ukrayinskoho dyskursu ta sposoby yiyi markuvannya. Linhvokulturolohichnyy ta linhvoekolohichnyy pidkhid do vyvchennya odynyts movy i movlennya: Monohrafiya. Olomouts–Ostroh: Vydavnytstvo Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiya».
Levchenko, Olena. 2015. “Intertekstualnist ukrayinskoho internet-dyskursu porevolyutsiynoho periodu”. Lyudyna. Kompyuter. Komunikatsiya. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoyi politekhniky 60–65.
Masimova, L. H. 2012. “Intertekstualnist yak osoblyvist suchasnoho mediatekstu (na prykladi analizu publikatsiy hazety “Den”)”. Masova komunikatsiya: istoriya, sohodennya, perspektyvy 1:104–107.
Mokiyenko, V., Sidorenko, K. 2004. Slovar krylatykh slov i vyrazheniy Pushkina. SPb.
Ponomarenko, M. 2017. “Intertekstualnist u suchasnykh ukrayinskykh ZMI: na shlyakhu do natsionalnoyi samoidentyfikatsiyi”. Rossica Olomucensia 56(1):55–70.
Potyatynyk, U. O. 2007. “Intertekstualnyi kharakter suchasnoho mediynoho dyskursu”. Naukovi Zapysky. Ser. «Filolohichna». Ostroh. 8:39–45.
Potyatynyk, U. O. 2008. “«Aktyvna» i «pasyvna» intertekstualnist u media-dyskursi”. Naukovyy visnyk Volynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrayinky. Lutsk: RVV «Vezha» VDU im. Lesi Ukrayinky 3:111–115.
Povetyeva, Elena. V. 2013. “Intertekstualnost v blogosfere i internet-kommunikatsii: retvit i repost”. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki.Tambov. 3:126–129.
P’ege-Gro, N. 2008. Vvedenie v teoriyu intertekstualnosti. M.: LKI.
Riffater, M. 1980. “Kriterii stilisticheskogo analiza.” Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Moskva. 69–91.
Rudenko, L. S. 2010. “Ukrayinska zhurnalna publitsystyka v paradyhmi postmodernizmu (80-ti rr. XX st. – pershe desyatylittya XXI st.)”. PhD diss., Zaporizhzhya: Klasych. pryvat. un-t.
Ryabinina, O. K. 2008. “Intertekstualnist u dyskursi suchasnoyi ukrayinskoyi presy: linhvistychnyy aspekt”. PhD diss., Kharkiv: Khark. nats. un-t im. V. N. Karazina.
Sidorenko, Konstyantin. 2005. “Ot krylatogo slova k interteksteme (mezhurovnevaya proyektsiya)”. Grani slova. Moskva. 143–148.
Sunko, N. O. 2011. “Intertekstualnist ta pretsedentnist yak reprezentanty publitsystychnoho dyskursu (na materiali zaholovkiv anhlomovnykh statey)”. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Ivana Franka 58: 208–212.
Tyapkina, N. I. 2011. “Intertekstualnist televiziynoho dyskursu. Naukovi zapysky Instytutu zhurnalistyky”. Kyiv: KNU imeni Tarasa Shevchenka 42: 6–8.
Ulman, Dzh. 1983. Osnovy system baz danykh. Moskva: Finansy i statystyka.
Vasina, O. O. 2009. “Transformatsiya yavyshcha intertekstualnosti v internet-novynakh”. Visnyk Kharkivskoho nats. un-tu 1(874): 14–18.
Yakymenko, L. M. Postmodernyy zriz intertekstualnosti v media-tekstakh. http://nauka.zinet.info/28/ yakymenko.php
Yampolsky, M. V. 1993. Pamyat Tiresiya: intertekstualnosti kinematograf. Moscow: Kultura Publ.
Zhenett, Zh. 1998. Figury. M.: Izd-vo im. Sabashnikovykh.
