COGNITIVE DYSSONANCE IN THE SITUATION OF SPEECH INTERRUPTION AND THE WAYS OF ITS OVERCOMING.

Authors

  • Tetiana Kyrychenko

Keywords:

interruption, cognitive dissonance, communication, dialogical discourse, interaction

Abstract

The article covers the general features of the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance in the context of interruptions in speech and elucidates the ways of its overcoming. The basic principle of overcoming cognitive dissonance is formulated, which reflects the intentional mood of the communicant. The reasons that determine the need for the interruption study in the framework of the theory of cognitive dissonance are determined, as well as the aims, tasks and methods of the research are outlined. The complex methodology is presented with the use of a number of methods: inductive-deductive, descriptive methods, as well as discourse analysis, contextual and cognitive analysis. The role of cognitive dissonance in the situation of speech interruptions, which performs the function of the regulator of communicators’ relations, is established. The general flow scheme of the interruption situation within the framework of the cognitive dissonance theory is proposed: the reason for interruption is the discrepancy in cognitive basis of the communicant, which entails the emergence of cognitive dissonance; if there is an intention to change the existing dissonant state, the communicant resorts to measures to improve personal psychological comfort. Particular attention is paid to three ways of overcoming cognitive dissonance in the context of the interruption, namely: changing their own behaviour, beliefs, attitudes towards the speaker, his/her statement, or the situation in general, a relationship, a controversial point of view regarding the information that has become the cause of dissonance in the cognitive world; involving a new cognitive element to the cognitive base, information that can reduce or overcome the state of dissonance; reducing the significance of their own cognitions (beliefs, relationships, knowledge). The results of the research are bolstered with the examples of dialogical discourse taken from the movies and works of contemporary British and American authors of the XX – XXI centuries. At the end of the article conclusions are presented and prospects for the further study of the interruptions in speech interaction are formulated.

References

Batsevych, Florii. 2010. Narysy z lingvistychoi pragmatyky. Lviv: PAIS.

Darren Star Productions. 2008. “Sex and the City”. Accessed January 10. http://putlocker.is/watch-sex-and-thecity-online-free-putlocker.html.

Festinger, Leon. 1957. Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Hodgetts, Helen., and Dylan Jones. 2006. “Interruption of the Tower of London task: Support for a Goalactivation Approach”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 135:103–115.

Karasik, Vladimir. 2000. “Struktura institutsionalnogo diskursa”. Problemy rechevoi kommunikatsii. Saratov: Izdatelstvo Saratovskogo universiteta 25–33.

Kazydub, Nadezhda. 2014. “Kognitivnyie osnovy ko-adaptatsii modelei narodnoi yazykovoi kategorizatsii”. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta 1(26):151–157.

Kennedy, Carol., and Carl Camden 1983. “A New Look at Interruptions.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 47:45–58.

Krantz, Judith. 1985. Spring Collection. New York: Bantam Books.

Makarov, Mikhail. 2003. Osnovy teorii diskursa. Moskva: Gnozis.

Murray, Stephen. 1985. “Toward a Model of Members' Methods for Recognizing Interruptions”. Language in Society 14(1):31–40.

Shahovskii, Viktor., and Alla Tsoi. 2012. “Rechevoy perebiv kak marker neekologichnoi bizneskommunikatsii”. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta 10(125):145–150.

Shevchenko, Iryna. 2005. “Kognityvno-pragmatichni doslidzhennya diskursu”. Diskurs yak kognityvnokomunikatyvnyi fenomen. Harkiv: Konstanta. 105–117.

Tiurina, Svetlana. 2003. “Leksiko-foneticheskie harakteristiki svyazuyuschih elementov diskursa v angliiskoi delovoi rechi (na materiale fraz vezhlivogo preryvaniia razgovora) ”. PhD diss., Ivanovo.

Warner Brothers Television. 1995. “Friends 1/12.” Accessed January 10. http://putlocker.is/watch-friends-tvshowseason-1-episode-12-online-free-putlocker.html.

Warner Brothers Television. 1997. “Friends 3/16.” Accessed January 10. http://putlocker.is/watch-friends-tvshowseason-3-episode-16-online-free-putlocker.html.

Warner Brothers Television. 1997. “Friends 4/5.” Accessed January 10. http://putlocker.is/watch-friends-tvshowseason-4-episode-5-online-free-putlocker.html.

Warner Brothers Television. 2000. “Friends 6/23.” Accessed January 10. http://putlocker.is/watch-friends-tvshowseason-6-episode-23-online-free-putlocker.html.

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Кириченко, Т. (2021). COGNITIVE DYSSONANCE IN THE SITUATION OF SPEECH INTERRUPTION AND THE WAYS OF ITS OVERCOMING. Current Issues of Foreign Philology, (10), 143–149. Retrieved from http://journals.vnu.volyn.ua/index.php/philology/article/view/1312