THE TACTICS OF IMPLICIT ACTUALIZATION OF CONSENT USED BY THE INTERLOCUTOR WHO IS THE OBJECT OF RECONCILIATION WITHIN THE COOPERATION STRATEGY

Abstract

The focus of the article is to explore the nature of the tactics of implicit actualization of consent used by the interlocutor who has suffered from the conflict and is the object of reconciliation. It has been determined that since the analyzed tactics are used to demonstrate a positive attitude to the initiator of reconciliation and declare the intention to resolve the conflict they implement the cooperative communication strategy. Having analyzed the fragments which represent the communicative situation of reconciliation in informal fiction discourse, the author has come to the conclusion that these tactics are aimed at minimizing the harm caused by the maleficent deed of the initiator of reconciliation, giving him moral support, as well as demonstrating willingness to restore harmonious relations. It has been determined that in the speech of the object of reconciliation the implicit consent to resolve the conflict can be declared by using the tactics of denying the initiator‟s guilt, admitting self-guilt, changing the assessment of the initiator‟s deed that has caused conflict, shifting the emphasis, generalization, demonstrating understanding of the reasons for the maleficent deed, cheering up and offering to forget the conflict. Using these tactics the object of reconciliation completely or partially denies the initiator‟s responsibility for the conflict, recognizes his own guilt in causing this conflict, emphasizes the positive effect caused by the maleficent deed of the initiator of reconciliation and manifests that the conflict situation is unable to affect the further harmonious relations negatively.