STRATEGIC DIVERSIFICATION OF AUTHORITARIAN DISCURSIVE BEHAVIOUR OF A TEENAGE GIRL IN MONO-GENDER COMMUNICATION WITH ADULTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-0927-2021-14-13Keywords:
authoritarianness, manipulation, mono-gender communication, teenager, strategyAbstract
The quick pace of development in modern society impacts the way a person communicates in various life spheres. Quite unexpected are the transformations in the sphere of power relations both in the formal and family contexts. This article aims at investigating the manifestation of authoritarian communication by a teenage girl and the strategic diversification in mono-gender contexts with women, in particular with the representatives of the nuclear (mother, cousin) and non-nuclear (doctor, mother’s friends, neighbours) zones of the person’s discursive surrounding. Authoritarianness implementation in interaction has been studied in adult speakers in general, and in children’s authoritarian communication with adults and children. Yet, focusing on the diversification of the strategic arsenal of a teenage addresser in mono-gender pairs with women addressees is highlighted for the first time. In order to achieve the goals set, the following methodology steps have been taken: we have selected discursive fragments which illustrate the attempts of a teenage girl to implement authoritarian strategies; relying upon the findings of linguistic pragmatics and the contextual analysis method we have characterized the variable linguistic features of implementing authoritarianness considering the factor of the addressee. It has been established that there is an interdependence between the pragmatic factors of the communicative situation (zones of one’s discursive surrounding, psychological disposition, social roles) and the authoritarian speaker’s strategic repertoire. The teenager resorts to implementing authoritarian manipulation with the representatives of the nuclear zone of their surrounding via the tactics of pretend kindness, appealing to emotions and blackmailing, and the strategy of selfassertion by means of the tactic of insult with the speakers from the non-nuclear zone of discursive surrounding, with whom there is observed a tendency to reduce the communicative distance and lowering the register of communication.
References
Козлова В. В. Реалізація виховного впливу в англомовному парентальному дискурсі: структурно-семантичний та прагматичний аспекти : дис. … канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04. Харків, 2012. 219 с.
Крючкова П. Г. Авторитарний дискурс (на матеріалі сучасної англійської мови) : дис. … канд. філол. наук : 10.02.04. Київ, 2003. 193 с.
Пахаренко А. В. Дитина як авторитарна дискурсивна особистість (на матеріалі сучасної англійської мови) : дис. … канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04. Харків, 2020. 260 с.
Пушкин А. А. Прагмалингвистические характеристики авторитарной языковой личности : автореф. дисс. на соискание уч. степени канд. филол. наук: спец. 10.02.19 «Теория языкознания». Чебоксары, 1992. 16 с.
Скриннік Ю. С. Дискурсивна варіативність вербальної та невербальної поведінки мовців при зміні соціальних ролей (на матеріалі англійської мови) : дис. … канд. філол. наук: 10.02.04. Харків, 2019. 247 с.
Солощук Л. В. Вербальні і невербальні компоненти комунікації в англомовному дискурсі : монографія. Харків : Константа, 2006. 300 с.
Blakar R. M. Language as a means of social power. Theoretical-empirical explorations of language and language use as imbedded in a social matrix. Pragmalinguistics: Theory and Practice. 1979. Vol. 85. P. 131–169.
Branje S. Development of parent-adolescent relationships: conflict interactions as a mechanism of change. Child Development Perspectives. 2018. Vol. 12, No 3. P. 171–176. URL: https://srcd.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cdep.//12278
Foucault M. Two lectures. Power / Knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 / ed. C. Gordon. New York : Pantheon Books, 1980. P. 78–108.
Karlberg M. The power of discourse and the discourse of power: pursuing peace through discourse intervention. International Journal of Peace Studies. 2005. Vol. 10, No 1. P. 1–25.
Knafo A. Authoritarians, the next generation: values and bullying among adolescent children of authoritarian fathers. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2003. Vol. 3, No 1. P. 199–204.
Kozlova V. V., Bagatska O. V. Verbal manifestation of mother discourse personality in the English parental discourse. Науковий вісник Міжнародного гуманітарного університету. Сер.: Філологія. 2021. № 47. Т. 1. С. 112–116.
Negm M. S. Resisting power in discourse. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015. No 192. P. 284–289.
Never Have I Ever (2021). URL: https://www.netflix.com/ua-ru/
Schmid Mast M. What can we learn from others’ power from their emotional expressions? The Social Nature of Emotion Expression / ed. U. Hess, Sh. Hareli. Cham : Springer, 2019. P. 179–197.
Soloshchuk L. V. The processes of diversification of the non-verbal communicative components in the modern English discourse. Cognition, communication, discourse. 2020. No. 21. P. 50–60.
Sorokina L. Communicative and pragmatic level of verbal manipulation. Research trends in modern linguistics and literature. 2018. Vol. 1. P. 135–146.