THE STRUCTURE, SEMANTICS AND FUNCTIONS OF BRACKETS AND NUMERALS IN THE CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH-LANGUAGE MASS-MEDIA COMMUNICATIVE SPACE

Authors

  • Larysa Makaryk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-0927-2020-12-21

Keywords:

mass-media, communicative space, brackets, numbers, function

Abstract

In this paper, as its title indicates, an analysis is presented of brackets and numerals, two specific non-verbal items in the general category of non-verbal and paraverbal elements which exist in the modern English-language mass media communicative space. By way of background, it could be mentioned that these items have been singled out from the overall category which may be termed "Non-pictographic and non-photographic elements" also includes other punctuation marks, as well as diacritical marks, typographic and other auxiliary signs, mathematical symbols, and abbreviations. As noted above, this study focuses in detail on the specific features of numerals and various types of brackets as integral modes within the media environment. Their semantic and structural features are outlined, their functions are identified, and their role and purpose in the modern English-language mass-media communicative space are substantiated. The customary textual function of parentheses and square brackets as punctuation marks has been to enclose explanatory information regarding the content of the text, or to clarify what is expressed outside the parenthesized text. However, in addition to these features and functions, reference can be made to braces and ‘curly’ and atypical modified (contextually dependent) brackets, which can perform non-traditional functions through differences in size, shape and quantitative composition, being deictic, content-branching, focusing, structuring, and compressive and clarificatory. Our study also demonstrated that in the English-language mass media communicative space, numerals may carry out the function of lexemes, graphemes and morphemes. They can be compressive in that they make it possible to reduce the number of traditional graphic elements that are part of a single lexeme. There are cases where a numeric character can act as a lexeme when used in place of the verbal expression. (This occurs most frequently with the numbers 2 and 4, which can take the place of the verbal units ‘two’, ‘to’, and ‘too’, and of ‘four’, ‘fore’, and ‘for’, as well as of syllables within longer words which contain these phonemes. These functions of these numerals can also be expanded by the use of differing shapes, sizes and colors.

References

Biletska, Oksana. 2014. “Hrafichna forma postmodernistskoho khudozhnoho tekstu kriz pryzmu hrafichnoi linhvistyky”. Nova filolohiya 60: 17–22.

Hrad, Natalia. 2014. “Suchasni multymodalni studii: modalna linhvistyka ta multymodalna stylistyka”. Odeskyi linhvistychnyi visnyk 4:49–51. URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/olinv_2014_4_15.

Yefymenko, Viktoriia. 2013. “Intertekstualni zviazky mizh tekstovymy svitamy kazkovykh tvoriv”. Studia linguistica 7: 322–326.

Karp, Marta. 2016. “Vzaiemodiia zasobiv kontaminovanoi leksychnoi kohezii v teksti anhliyskykh multymodalnykh literaturnykh kazok Filipa Arda”. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu “Ostrozka akademiia”. Seriia: Filolohiia 62: 136–139.

Marina, Olena. 2015. Semiotyka paradoksalnosti u kohnityvno-komunikatyvnomu vysvitlenni (na materiali suchasnoho anhlomovnoho poetychnoho dyskursu): monohrafiia. Kherson: Ailant.

Bezemer, Jeff. 2014. “Multimodal Transcription: a Case Study”. Interactions, Images and Texts: a Reader in Multimodality. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton 155–170.

Jewitt, Carey. 2008. “Multimodal Classroom Research”. AERA Review of Research in Education 32: 241–267.

Kress, Gunther. 2003. Literacy in the New Media Age. London; New York: Routledge.

Norris, Sigrid. 2009. “Modal Density and Modal Configurations: Multimodal Actions”. The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis / ed. by C. Jewitt. London; New York: Routledge 78–91.

O’Halloran, Kay. 2014. Multimodal Studies: Exploring Issues and Domains (Routledge Studies in Multimodality). 1st ed., 1–41.

Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2004. Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.

About Britannia. Digital Vidya. URL: https://www.digitalvidya. com/blog/relaunch-of-britannia-gooddaymade-a-significant-boost-in-its-perception-and-sales/ (дата звернення: 06.11.2017).

Advertising Leaflet. 2017. URL: http://www. hongkiat.com/blog/creative (дата звернення: 19.08.2018).

Contribute New York. 2006. No. 2. Vol. 1. May/June. 96 p.

Echo. 2018. No. 43, 758. Saturday, May, 26. 55 p.

Financial Times. 2010. No. 37, 271. Tuesday, March, 30. 44 p.

Financial Times. 2010. No.26, 547. Thursday, March, 25. 58 p.

FT Weekend Magazine. 2009. No. 302. March, 28–29. 48 p.

FT Weekend. 2010. No. 37436. Saturday/Sunday, October, 9–10. 64 p.

International Herald Tribune. 2008. No. 39, 057. Saturday/Sunday, October, 4–5. 24 p.

International Herald Tribune. 2009. No. 39, 155. Thursday, January, 29. 22 p.

International Herald Tribune. 2009. No. 39, 175. Saturday/Sunday, February, 21–22. 20 p.

National Geographic. 2009. No. 1. Vol. 215. January. 154 p.

National Geographic. 2009. No. 4. Vol. 215. April. 154 p.

National Geographic. 2009. No. 6. Vol. 215. June. 141 p.

Newsweek. 2001–2002. No. 1. December / January, 31–7. 96 p.

Newsweek. 2004. No. 10. September, 6–13. 102 p.

The Daily Telegraph. 2009. No. 47, 943. Friday, July, 24. 62 p.

The Daily Telegraph. 2009. No. 48, 054. Tuesday, December, 1. 62 p.

The Economist. 2014–2015. № 8918, Vol. 413. December/January, 20–2. 79 р.

The Independent. 2010. No. 7, 370. Tuesday, May, 27. 76 p.

The New York Times. 2010. No. 55, 051. Tuesday, May, 25. 68 p.

The Sun. 2018. Saturday, April, 28. 72 p.

The Sun. 2018. Thursday, May, 10. 60 p.

The Times. 2008. No. 69 289. Friday, April, 4. 96 p.

Time. 2009. No. 10. Vol. 174. September, 14. 54 p.

Time. 2009. No. 6. Vol. 173. February, 9. 60 p.

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Макарук, Л. (2021). THE STRUCTURE, SEMANTICS AND FUNCTIONS OF BRACKETS AND NUMERALS IN THE CONTEMPORARY ENGLISH-LANGUAGE MASS-MEDIA COMMUNICATIVE SPACE. Current Issues of Foreign Philology, (12), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-0927-2020-12-21