MASKING OF EMOTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION

Authors

  • Elina Koliada
  • Olena Melnyk

Keywords:

emotion, masking, inhibition, simulation, manipulation, interpersonal communication

Abstract

The article deals with masking of emotions in communicative interaction. Interpersonal communication is highly influenced by the interlocutors’ feelings and emotions. One way in which the very interpersonality of interpersonal communication affects its character is display rules. Interlocutors sometimes have to control the way they display their emotions and feelings. This article considers the three expression management techniques or display rules: inhibition, masking, and simulation. Inhibition involves giving the impression of having no feelings when one truly experiences some emotion. Masking involves communicating an emotion that is entirely different than the one a person is experiencing. Simulation involves displaying an emotion when no such emotion is being experienced. Masking may be regarded as a combination of inhibiting and simulating. Emotion regulation decisions are based on politeness rituals, situational appropriateness and individual goals. Masking is vital during manipulation. Any emotional expression can be used to conceal any other emotion. Emotions are displayed via verbal and non-verbal means of communication. Nonverbal channels are likely to ‘leak’ information deliberately concealed in the controllable verbal channel. Smiles are often used to mask certain feelings. Interlocutors use smiles either to mask negative emotions or to appear as if positive feelings are felt. The smile mask is often selected because many lies require some signal of happiness in order to successfully pull off deceit. Another reason the smile is used as a mask so often is because smiling is part of standard greetings. The interpretation of a smile depends on the communicative situation in which it occurs, the emotional state of the addressee, the relationship between the interlocutors, etc. The emotions and feelings are portrayed in literary texts. The authors either use lexemes-nominations of different emotional states or depict characters’ movements, gestures and postures that convey emotional information and help readers to correctly identify the emotions. The readers’ inferences spring from the interaction of textual information and their own experience and knowledge.

References

Ekman, Paul, and Friesen, Wallace V. 1969. “The Repertoire or Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage and Coding”. Semiotica 1:49–98.

Ekman, Pol. 2015. Teoriya brekhni. Kyyiv: Kompaniya OSMA.

Epshteyn, Ol’ga. 2017. “Maskirovka emotsiy v angloyazychnykh proizvedeniyakh zhanra antiutopii”. Filologicheskiye nauki. Voprosy teorii i praktiki 4(1):191–194.

Ganina, Vera, i Kartashkova, Faina. 2006. Emotsii cheloveka i neverbalnoye povedeniye: gendernyy aspekt. Ivanovo: Ivanovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet.

Ganina, Vera, i Pesyakova, Anna. 2008. “Maskirovka emotsiy cheloveka s pomoshchyu neverbalnogo povedeniya (na materiale angloyazychnykh detektivnikh romanov)”. Vestnik gumanitarnogo fakulteta Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo khimiko-tekhnologicheskogo universiteta 3:176–180.

Ilin, Evgeniy. 2002. Emotsii i chuvstva. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.

Kotstsolino, Mauro. 2015. Neverbalnaya kommunikatsiya. Teoriya, funktsiya, yazyk i znak. Perevod O. A. Shipilovoy. Kharkov: Gumanitarnyy tsentr.

Kreydlin, G. E., Chuvilina, E. A. 2001. “Ulybka kak zhest i kak slovo (k probleme vnutriyazykovoy tipologii neverbalnykh aktov)”. Voprosy yazykoznaniya 4:66–93.

Kreydlin, Grigoriy. 2002. Neverbalnaya semiotika. Yazyk tela i estestvennyy yazyk. Moskva: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.

Pereverzeva, Irina. 1989. “Proyavleniye individualnykh razlichiy po emotsionalnosti v funktsii kontrolia za emotsionalnoi ekspressiyey”. Voprosy psikhologii 1:113–117.

Ryukle, Khorst. 1996. Vashe taynoye oruzhiye v obshchenii: mimika, zhest, dvizheniye. Moskwa: “Inter·ekspert”; AO «INFRA-M».

Shelgunova, Lidiya. 1978. “Vzaimootnosheniye yazykovykh i parayazykovykh faktorov v romane L. N. Tolstogo “Voskreseniye””. Filologicheskiye nauki 3:70–79.

Vansyatskaya, Elena, and Kartashkova, Faina. 2005. Neverbalnyie komponenty kommunikatsii v angliyskom khudozhestvennom tekste. Ivanovo: Izdatelstvo Ivanovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.

Variy, Myron. 2009. Zahalna psykholohiya. Kyyiv: Tsentr uchbovoyi literatury.

Vryganova, Kseniya. 2012. “Yazykovaya reprezentatsiya fenomena maskirovki emotsiy cheloveka (na materiale angliyskikh khudozhestvennykh tekstov)”. PhD diss., Ivanovo.

Znakov, Vladimir. 2000. “Makiavellizm: psikhologicheskoye svoystvo lichnosti i metodika ego issledovaniya”. Psikhologicheskiy zhurnal 21(5):16–22.

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Коляда, Е., & Мельник, О. (2021). MASKING OF EMOTIONS IN THE PROCESS OF INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION. Current Issues of Foreign Philology, (11), 66–71. Retrieved from http://journals.vnu.volyn.ua/index.php/philology/article/view/1006