THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL JUSTIFICATION OF A SYSTEMATIC APPROACH IN RESEARCH OF PROFESSIONAL WELL-BEING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/psych.studies/2025.2.6Keywords:
professional well-being, systemic approach, self-regulation system, functional systemAbstract
The article presents a theoretical and methodological justification of the systemic approach in the study of professional well-being of an individual. Professional well-being is viewed as a complex holistic system with an internal structure represented by a set of interconnected and interacting components that ensure its functioning. Professional well-being as a holistic phenomenon acquires a qualitatively new property, absent in its constituent elements, which is formed because of the interconnection and interaction of these elements within the whole, namely, the ability to self-regulate. Professional well-being appears as a dynamic system that strives to maintain equilibrium according to the concept of homeostasis and general systems theory. Maintaining balance indicates a favorable development of events for the employee, an indicator of which is the degree of his satisfaction with the results of his professional activities. When the balance is disturbed under the influence of the work environment or internal personal factors, personal resources are mobilized to return to the previous balance or ensure a new state of equilibrium and, thereby, ensure the integrity of the system. The methodological basis for the study of professional well-being as a complex system is a systems approach. The systems approach is the leading methodological basis of many branches of modern science, including psychology. Organizing the research on the principles of a systemic approach will allow us to fully consider individual aspects of the phenomenon under study, compare empirical data and systematize them to understand the phenomenology of the process of forming well-being in a professional context, and analyze individual elements of an individual’s professional well-being in connection with its holistic functioning.
References
Волинець Н. Психологія особистісного благополуччя персоналу Державної прикордонної служби України : дис. … докт. психол. наук : 19.00.01. Київ, 2020. 543 с.
Тофтул М. Холізм. Сучасний словник з етики. Житомир : Вид-во ЖДУ ім. І. Франка, 2014. С. 381–382.
Кустовська О. Методологія системного підходу та наукових досліджень : курс лекцій. Тернопіль : Економічна думка, 2005. 124 с.
Sudakov K. The theory of functional systems: general postulates and principles of dynamic organization (dedicated to the Anokhin Centenary). Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society. 1997. Vol. 32 (4). P. 392–414.
Войтенко О. Професійне благополуччя в системі саморегуляції особистості: теоретична модель. Психологічні студії. 2024. № 1. С. 18–23.
Weiss H. M., Cropanzano R. Affective events theory: a theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. Research in Organizational Behavior. 1996. V. 18. P. 1–74.
Mason C. M., Griffin M. A. Group task satisfaction: the group’s shared attitude to its task and work environment. Group and Organization Management. 2005. V. 30. P. 623–652.
Danna K., Griffin R. W. Health and well-being in the workplace: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Management. 1999. V. 25 (3). P. 357–384.
Warr P. Work, happiness, and unhappiness. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007. 562 p.
Ткаченко О. Принципи і категорії психології. Київ : Вища школа, 1979. 200 с.
Glavinska O., Ovdiyenko I., Brukhovetska O., Chausova T., Didenko M. Professional selfrealization as a factor in the psychological well-being of specialists of caring professions. Journal of Intellectual Disability-Diagnosis and Treatment. 2020. V. 8 (3). P. 548–559.
Фурта І. Порівняльний аналіз поняття «переживання» у різних психологічних підходах. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія «Психологічні науки». 2020. Вип. 4. С. 26–32.