MODERN APPROACHES TO QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF SOCIAL REHABILITATION SERVICES FOR CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/humanitas/2024.4.10Keywords:
social rehabilitation, social rehabilitation services, child with disabilities, monitoring and quality assessmentAbstract
The publication reveals the topic of monitoring and evaluating the quality of social rehabilitation services for children with disabilities and key aspects related to approaches to ensuring the effectiveness of these services. The main focus is on the comprehensiveness of the assessment, which covers both quantitative and qualitative indicators, which allows taking into account the individual needs of each child and providing the appropriate level of support. The article also examines approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of providing rehabilitation services and their degree of compliance with international standards. The tools that can be used for quality monitoring are considered, including questionnaires, observations, the degree of achievement of individual rehabilitation goals, assessment of clinical indicators, quality of life and degree of satisfaction of the child and parents, which allows providing feedback and making the necessary adjustments in the process of providing social rehabilitation services. The importance of integrating an interdisciplinary approach to monitoring and evaluating the quality of services, which combines the efforts of specialists from various fields to achieve optimal results in the rehabilitation of children with disabilities, is emphasized. The article reveals the importance of involving families in the process of assessing the quality of services, as it contributes to a better understanding of the needs of children and their families, as well as increasing the level of trust and cooperation between families and social workers, thanks to which services become more targeted and effective. The publication emphasizes the feasibility of developing national quality standards, regular external audits in the process of monitoring and evaluating rehabilitation services, as well as the introduction of modern information technologies.
References
Baili P., Hoekstra-Weebers J., Van Hoof E., Bartsch H. H., Travado L., Garami M., EUROCHIP-3 Working group on Cancer Rehabilitation. Cancer rehabilitation indicators for Europe. European Journal of Cancer. 2013. Vol. 49(6). P. 1356–1364.
Bjarnason-Wehrens B., McGee H., Zwisler A. D., Piepoli M. F., Benzer W., Schmid J. P., Mendes M. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: results from the European cardiac rehabilitation inventory survey. European journal of preventive cardiology. 2010. Vol. 17(4). P. 410–418.
Brown K. The effectiveness of structured surveys in evaluating rehabilitation services for children with disabilities. Rehabilitation Review. 2019. Vol. 37(2). P. 115–130.
Cieza A., Causey K., Kamenov K., Hanson S. W., Chatterji S., Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2020. Vol. 396(10267). P. 2006–2017.
Communication and Assistive Technology Assessment Services. 2023. URL: https://www.acc.co.nz/assets/contracts/cata-og.pdf
Doe A., White P., Green M. Clinical indicators as a tool for monitoring rehabilitation outcomes in children with disabilities. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitation. 2021. Vol. 45(3). P. 301–312.
Education Based Rehabilitation Assessment Service. 2023. URL: https://www.acc.co.nz/assets/contracts/ebras-og.pdf
Gur A., Hindi T. N., Mashiach S., Roth D., Keren, M. Parental reflective functioning and coping among parents of toddlers with severe developmental disabilities: An early integrative bio-psycho-social rehabilitative intervention in daycare facilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2023. Vol. 139. P. 104555.
Guralnick M. J. The system of early intervention for children with developmental disabilities: Current status and challenges for the future. Handbook of intellectual and developmental disabilities. 2007. P. 465–480.
Housing Modification (HMOD) and Housing Assessment (HMA) Services: Operational Guidelines. Available from: https://www.accessable.co.nz/media/1996/acc-hmod-operational-guidelines-2021.pdf
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9000:2015: Quality management systems—Fundamentals and vocabulary. ISO. 2015. URL: https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/45481/7a88f2b85cec4438a96de8da61970d1c/ISO-9000-2015.pdf
Järvikoski A., Martin M., Autti-Rämö I., Härkäpää K. Shared agency and collaboration between the family and professionals in medical rehabilitation of children with severe disabilities. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2013. Vol. 36(1). P. 30–37.
Jones M., Brown K. Integrated care approaches for children with disabilities: Evaluating service delivery models. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2020. Vol. 42(12). P. 1602–1610.
Kukulska-Hulme A., Garnett F. Digital approaches to the evaluation of rehabilitation services for children with disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2022. Vol. 59(4). P. 1–15.
Langhammer B., Becker F., Sunnerhagen K. S., Zhang T., Du X., Bushnik T., Stanghelle J. K. Specialized stroke rehabilitation services in seven countries. International Journal of Stroke. 2015. Vol. 10(8). P. 1236–1246.
Layton N., Bell D., Buning M. E., Chen, S. C., Contepomi S., Delgado Ramos, V., de Witte L. Opening the GATE: systems thinking from the global assistive technology alliance. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 2020. Vol. 15(5). P. 484–490.
Lindsay S., Edwards A. A systematic review of disability awareness interventions for children and youth. Disability and rehabilitation. 2013. Vol. 35(8). P. 623–646.
Magnusson D., Sweeney F., Landry M. Provision of rehabilitation services for children with disabilities living in low-and middle-income countries: A scoping review. Disability and rehabilitation. 2019. Vol. 41(7). P. 861–868.
Maloni P. K., Despres E. R., Habbous J., Primmer A. R., Slatten J. B., Gibson B. E., Landry M. D. Perceptions of disability among mothers of children with disability in Bangladesh: Implications for rehabilitation service delivery. Disability and rehabilitation. 2010. Vol. 32(10). P. 845–854.
Miller D., Thompson R. The role of digital technologies in monitoring the quality of rehabilitation services for children with disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 2018. Vol. 31(5). P. 779–790.
Miller E. A., di Domenico M. Evaluation of rehabilitation services for children with disabilities: A systematic review. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020. Vol. 13(3). P. 371–386.
Rehabilitation Needs Assessment (RNA). Available from: https://www.nj.gov/humanservices/dmhas/initiatives/PRNAandCRNATemplate.pdf
Sheikh A., Anderson M., Albala S., Casadei B., Franklin B. D., Richards M., Mossialos E. Health information technology and digital innovation for national learning health and care systems. The Lancet Digital Health. 2021. Vol. 3(6). P. e383–e396.
Silva J. D. M., Yamada M. O., Guedes E. G., Moret A. L. M. Factors influencing the quality of life of children with cochlear implants. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology. 2020. Vol. 86. P. 411–418.
Skempes D., Melvin J., Von Groote P., Stucki G., Bickenbach J. Using concept mapping to develop a human rights based indicator framework to assess country efforts to strengthen rehabilitation provision and policy: the Rehabilitation System Diagnosis and Dialogue framework (RESYST). Globalization and health. 2018. Vol. 14. P. 1–22.
Smith J., Kettle M. Monitoring and evaluating disability services: Insights from a global perspective. Disability & Society. 2021. Vol. 36(6). P. 917–936.
Smith J., Doe A., Taylor L. Observational methods for assessing the quality of rehabilitation services in pediatric care. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities. 2020. Vol. 32(4). P. 521–533.
Smith J., Doe A., White P. Assessment tools for children with disabilities: A review of current practices. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2019. Vol. 42(4). P. 323–331.
Stoliaryk O. Semigina T. “Does Change Last?”: Evaluating the Strengths-Based Intervention for Families Raising Children with Autism. The New Educational Review. 2022. Vol. 69. P. 209–220.
Support needs assessment. URL: https://www.prospectusnovus.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/SNA-FORM-PDF.pdf
Turner B., Cox E., Lever C. Measuring satisfaction with child disability services: A review of the literature. Journal of Child Health Care. 2018. Vol. 22(1). P. 53–66.
World Health Organization, Geneva. Global report on assistive technology. 2022. URL: https://www.who.int/southeastasia/publications/i/item/9789240049451
World Health Organization. Together on the road to universal health coverage: a call to action (No. WHO/HIS/HGF/17.1). 2017.
World Health Organization. Health information systems and rehabilitation (No. WHO/NMH/NVI/17.2). 2017.
World Health Organization. Delivering quality health services: A global imperative for universal health coverage. 2018. URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272465
Горішна Н., Петрочко Ж., Столярик О. Законодавчі аспекти соціальної реабілітації дітей з інвалідністю: вітчизняний та зарубіжний досвід. Інклюзія і суспільство. 2023. Вип. 2. С. 19–27. URL: https://journals.kpdi.in.ua/index.php/inclusion-society/article/view/36
Ковальчук Т. Оцінка ефективності реабілітаційних послуг для дітей з інвалідністю в умовах інклюзивної освіти. Практична психологія та соціальна робота. 2020. Вип. 8(1). С. 45–50. URL: https://doi.org/10.32436/2219-2348/2020-8(1)-5
Кудрявцева О. Моніторинг якості соціальних послуг для дітей з інвалідністю: український контекст. Науковий вісник Херсонського державного університету. Серія: Соціальна робота. 2021. Вип. 43(1) С. 28–33. URL: https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu2312-3206/2021-43-4
Столярик О., Семигіна Т. Сімейноцентричній підхід до підтримки родин, які виховують дітей з ментальними порушеннями. Репрезентація освітніх досягнень, мас-медіа та роль філології у сучасній системі наук. Вінниця: Європейська наукова платформа. 2021. URL: https://doi.org/10.36074/rodmmrfssn.ed-2.05
Столярик О., Семигіна Т. Якість життя сімей, які виховують дітей з аутизмом: концепція та чинники. Збірник наукових праць Хмельницького інституту соціальних технологій Університету «Україна». 2019. Вип. 18. С. 60–63.
Столярик О., Семигіна Т., Зубчик О. Сімейна соціальна робота: реалії України. Науковий вісник Південно-українського національного педагогічного університету імені К. Д. Ушинського. 2020. Вип. 4. С. 28–46.
