ETHICAL TENSIONS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTEGRATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/apv/2025.6.15Keywords:
artificial intelligence, higher education, ethics, academic integrity, educational equity, data privacy, pedagogical innovationAbstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence technologies into higher education has created unprecedented ethical challenges that demand immediate scholarly attention and institutional response. This article examines four fundamental ethical tensions arising from AI adoption in academic contexts: the conflict between academic integrity and pedagogical innovation, the balance between student autonomy and institutional oversight, the imperative of educational equity within unequal access to AI resources, and the trade-off between operational efficiency and student privacy protection. The research demonstrates that traditional conceptions of academic integrity, designed for pre-AI educational environments, prove inadequate when AI tools offer assistance ranging from clearly appropriate to clearly problematic. Similarly, AI-enabled surveillance capabilities create tensions between legitimate institutional responsibilities for educational quality and students’ rights to privacy and autonomous learning. The study further represents how AI integration threatens to extend existing educational inequalities through differential access to premium tools, uneven distribution of AI literacy, and algorithmic bias embedded in educational systems. Finally, the analysis reveals how efficiency gains from automated assessment and learning analytics depend on extensive data collection practices that raise profound privacy concerns, particularly when students lack meaningful consent options or transparency about data usage. The article argues that effective ethical AI integration requires moving beyond prohibitive or permissive extremes toward principle-based frameworks emphasizing transparency, proportionality, equity, and student participation in governance. These findings contribute to emerging scholarship on educational technology ethics while providing practical guidance for institutions navigating the complex landscape of AI-augmented learning environments. The research underscores that addressing AI ethics in higher education is not merely a technical or policy challenge but fundamentally involves reimagining educational values, power relationships, and the purposes of learning in an AI-integrated world.
References
AI competency framework for students. (2025, August 18). UNESCO. URL: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-students.
Bai̇doo-Anu D., Ansah L. O. Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI. 2023. Vol. 7(1). P. 52–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500.
Baker R. S., Hawn A. Algorithmic bias in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2021. Vol. 32(4). P. 1052–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00285-9.
ChatGPT, AI, and Academic dishonesty. Cal Poly Humboldt. URL: https://www.humboldt.edu/dean-students/quicklinks/chatgpt-ai-and-academic-dishonesty.
ChatGPT, Artificial Intelligence, and academic integrity. Office of Academic Integrity. 2025. URL: https://oai.mis-souri.edu/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-and-academic-integrity/.
Cotton D. R., Cotton P. A., Shipway J. R. Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2023. Vol. 61 (2). P. 228–239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148.
Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO eBooks. 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.54675/ewzm9535.
Holstein K., Doroudi S. Equity and artificial intelligence in education: Will “AIED” amplify or alleviate inequities in education? URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12920.
Holstein K., Doroudi S. (2022). Equity and artificial intelligence in education. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Education . P. 151–173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429329067-9.
Mollick E. R., Mollick L. Assigning AI: Seven Approaches for Students, with Prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4475995.
Mollick E. R., Mollick L. Instructors as Innovators: a Future-focused Approach to New AI Learning Opportunities, With Prompts. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4802463.
Prinsloo P., Slade S. Ethics and Learning Analytics: Charting the (UN)Charted. Society for Learning Analytics Research (SoLAR) eBooks. 2017. P. 49–57). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17.004.
Rudolph J., Tan S., Tan S. ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching. 2023. 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9.
The challenges of AI in higher education and the imperative for competency frameworks. 2025. URL: https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/en/articles/challenges-ai-higher-education-and-imperative-competency-frameworks.






