BASIC NOTIONS OF SENSORY LINGUISTICS

Authors

  • Elina Koliada
  • Tetiana Lisinska

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-0927-2020-12-19

Keywords:

sensory linguistics, perceptuality, perceptual mode, sensory vocabulary, part of speech

Abstract

The article considers the key notions of sensory linguistics, which deals with the system of linguistic representations of physiological indicators of the five senses – sight, hearing, smell, taste, and touch. Sensory linguistics is the study of how language relates to the senses. Sensory perception is the reflection of certain properties of objects during their immediate action on a sense organ. According to the amount of perceived information, vision ranks first and hearing ranks in second place, followed by the subordinate senses of smell, taste and touch. Perceptual language describes physical feelings using words based on the five senses, with the lexical level being the most significant. The inequality of perceptual sensations, as well as the different number of linguistic signs of their expression, is reflected in the vocabulary of the language. Linguists suggest that there is more lexical differentiation for visual concepts than for the other senses. Sensory words belong to different parts of speech: nouns, adjectives, verbs, and adverbs, since all words perform a nominative function. Perceptual features expressed by nouns are objectified; adjectives express perceptual features that do not evolve in time and are inseparable from objects; verbs express dynamic perceptual features, and adverbs express perceptual features as secondary qualities, i.e. qualities of another (dynamic or static) quality. Perceptuality can be regarded as a linguistic category. In sensory linguistics, the basic notion is “sensory”, which is used along with the notion “perceptual”. However, in the English tradition, the notion “sensory” is associated with sensation, and the notion “perceptual” – with perception. Linguists use the term “perceptual mode” to refer to a particular type of sensation. The terms denoting perceptual modalities are of Latin origin: “visual”, “audible”, “tactile” (“haptic”), “olfactory”, and “gustatory”. Other frequently used terms are “sensory experience”, “percipient”, and “experimenter”. The term “percipient’ presupposes the actual, available sensory experience gained “here and now”, and the term “experimenter” – the total sensory experience accumulated during a person’s life.

References

Apresian, Yuriy. 1995. Izbrannyye trudy. T. 1: Leksicheskaya semantika: Sinonimicheskiye sredstva yazyka. Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kultury.

Arutiunova, Nina. 1999. Yazyk i mir cheloveka. Moskva: Yazyki russkoy kultury.

Bakhtin, Nikolai. 1995. Iz zhyzni idey: Statyi, esse, dialogi. Moskva: Labirint.

Bulyubash, Anzhela. 2016. “Pertseptivnyi modus “zapakh” i sredstva ego yazykovogo oznachivaniya v poeticheskoy rechi I. A. Bunina i N. A. Zabolotskogo”. Mezhdunarodnyy nauchno-issledovatelskiy zhurnal. Ekaterinburg: Poligrafist 8(50), 5: 90–93. doi.10.18454/IRJ.2016.50.218.

Bryleva, Roza. 2016. “Funktsionalno-semanticheskoe issledovaniye olfaktornoi leksiki v russkom, frantsuzskom i bashkirskom yazykakh”. PhD diss., Ufa.

Drobnick, Jim. 2006. “Introduction: Olfactocentrism”. The Smell Culture Reader. Oxford, New York: Berg Publishers 1–9.

Epshteyn, Mikhail. 2006. “Khaptika: Chelovek osyazayushchiy”. Telo svobody. Sankt-Peterburg: Aleteyya16–38.

Frolova, Olga. 2006. “Pertseptivnyi modus v zhestko strukturirovannom tekste”. Philological Studies 4(1). https://journals.ukim.mk/index.php/philologicalstudies/article/view/814/736

Hoffmann, Viktoria von. 2016. From gluttony to Enlightenment: The world of taste in Early Modern Europe. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Holley, Andre. 2002. “Cognitive aspects of olfaction in perfumer practice”. Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 16–26.

Howes, David. 2003. Sensual relations: Engaging the senses in culture and social theory. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Howes, David, and Classen, Constance. 2014. Ways of sensing: Understanding the senses in society. New York: Routledge.

Johnson, Bruce. 2017. “Sound studies today: Where are we going?” A Cultural History of Sound, Memory, and the Senses. New York: Routledge 7–22.

Kharchenko, Vera. 2012. Lingvosensorika: Fundamentalnyye i prikladnyye aspekty. Moskva: Knizhnyy dom “Librokom”.

Kondilyak, Etyenn Bonno. 1982. “Traktat ob oshchushcheniyakh”. Sobraniye sochineniy: v 3-kh t. Moskva: Mysl 2: 189–399.

Kostyayev, Aleksandr. 2007. Vkusovyye metafory i obrazy v kulture. Moskva: Izdatelstvo LKI.

Luriya, Aleksandr. 2006. Lektsii po obshchey psikhologii. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.

Majid, Asifa, and Levinson, Stephen C. 2011. “The senses in language and culture”. Senses and Society 6(1): 5–18.

Nagornaya, Aleksandra. 2014. Diskurs nevyrazimogo: Verbalika vnutritelesnykh oshchushcheniy. Moskwa: LENAND.

Nagornaya, Aleksandra. 2017. Lingvosensorika kak perspektivnoye napravleniye sovremennykh lingvisticheskikh issledovaniy. Moskva: INION RAN.

Osgud, Charlz. 2009. “Znacheniye termina ‘vospriyatiye’ ”. Psikhologiya oshchushcheniy i vospriyatiya. Moskva: AST: Astrel 94–96.

Polyakov, Sergey. 2007. Mify i realnost sovremennoi psikhologii. Moskva: Editorial URSS.

Psykholohichna entsyklopediya, ed. by O. M. Stepanov. 2006. Kyyiv: “Akademvydav”.

Ruzin, Igor. 1995. “Modusy pertseptsii (zreniye, slukh, osyazaniye, obonyaniye, vkus) i ikh vyrazheniye v yazyke”. PhD diss., Moskwa.

Ryabtseva, Nadezhda. 2005. Yazyk i estestvennyy intellekt. Moskwa: Academia.

Semashko, Tetyana. 2015. “Verbalna obyektyvatsiya ponyattyevoyi sfery ‘pertseptyvne spryynyattya’ ”. Movni i kontseptualni kartyny svitu 51: 465–472.

Semashko, Tetyana. 2016. Movni stereotypy iz sensornym komponentom v ukrayinskiy linhvokulturi. Kyiv: Art Ekonomi.

Smith, Mark M. 2007. Sensing the past: Seeing, hearing, smelling, tasting and touching in history. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Stavytska, Lesya. 2006. “Stat kriz pryzmu zapakhu”. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu. Seriya filolohichna. 38(II): 72–78.

Todes, Samuel. 2001. Body and world. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Ltd.

Verkhoturova, Tatiana. 2009. “Lingvofilosofskaya priroda metakategorii ‘nablyudatel’ ”. PhD diss., Irkutsk.

Vinogradov, Viktor. 1986. Russkiy yazyk. Grammaticheskoye ucheniye o slove. Moskwa: Vysshaya shkola.

Winter, Bodo. 2019. Sensory Linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi. 10.1075/celcr.20

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

Коляда, Е., & Лісінська, Т. (2021). BASIC NOTIONS OF SENSORY LINGUISTICS. Current Issues of Foreign Philology, (12), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.32782/2410-0927-2020-12-19