COMPARISON OF WIREFRAME AND IMPLICIT GEOLOGICAL MODELING ALGORITHMS IN MICROMINE

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/geochasvnu.2024.4.16

Keywords:

wireframe modeling, implicit modeling, reserve estimation, mineral resources, comparative analysis

Abstract

The article aims to compare the main algorithms and results of explicit and implicit modeling in the Micromine software. Conducting a quantitative analysis of both methods' outcomes will determine their accuracy and suitability for practical use in geological exploration and further deposit development. The article discusses the methodology of applying each approach and provides a comparative analysis to identify the advantages and disadvantages of each method. The research findings can be valuable for geologists and mining enterprises using Micromine for geological modeling and mineral reserve estimation. Additionally, it examines the potential for integrating both methods and suggests further avenues for research to enhance modeling accuracy and efficiency.

References

Баряцька Н.В., Гейченко М.В., Сафронова Н.Г. Основні етапи тривимірного моделювання на прикладі Шевченківського родовища літієвих руд. V міжнародна науково-практична конференція «Надрокористування в Україні. Перспективи інвестування», у 2 т. (8‒12 жовтня 2018 р., м. Трускавець). Київ : ДКЗ, 2018. Т. 1. С. 211‒217.

Barnes J. F. H., Gossage B.L. The Do’s and Don’ts of Geological and Grade Boundary Models and What You Can Do About It. Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve Estimation. The AusIMM Guide to Good Practice. Second edition. AusIMM, 2014. P. 175‒188.

Bariatska N. Micromine Tools for Geological and Economic Assessment of Mineral Projects. Conference: 16th International Conference Monitoring of Geological Processes and Ecological Condition of the Environment. 15–18 November 2022, Kyiv, 2022, Vol. 2022, P. 1–5. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.2022580150.

Benyu Li, Deyun Zhong and Liguan Wang. Repair of Geological Models Based on Multiple Material Marching Cubes. Mathematics. 2021. No 9 (18). 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9182207.

Guo Jia-teng, Wu Li-xin, Zhou Wen-hui. Automatic ore body implicit 3D modeling based on radial basis function surface. Meitan Xuebao/Journal of the China Coal Society. 2016. Vol. 41. No 8. P. 2130‒2135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13225/j.cnki.

Mc Lennan J., Deutsch C.V. Boundsim: Implicit Boundary Modeling, APCOM 2007. Santiago, Chile, April 2007, 9 p.

Ouyang, J., Zhang, G., Cao, P., Li, W. A Three-Dimensional Geological Modelling Method Using a Modified Marching Cubes Algorithm. Elsevier BV. 2023. 32 p. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4624601.

Souza F.S. Uso de métodos geoestatísticos no auxílio da modelagem geológica. 2007, 157f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Minas, Metalúrgica e de Materiais. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 2007.

Yamamoto J.K. (ed.). Avaliação e classificação de reservas minerais. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2001. 232 p.

Published

2024-11-06

Issue

Section

SECTION IV. GEOECOLOGY AND GEOINFORMATICS